By Will Houcheime, Product Marketing Manager, Bitglass
Today, organizations are finding that storing and processing their data in the cloud brings countless benefits. However, without the right tools (such as cloud access security brokers (CASBs), they can put themselves at risk. Organizations’ IT departments understand how vital cybersecurity is, but must be equipped with modern tools in order to secure their data. CASBs protect against a wide range of security concerns that enterprises face when migrating to the cloud. Consequently, they have quickly increased in popularity and have become a one-stop-shop for countless enterprise security needs.
BYOD, SaaS or IaaS
Depending on the industry in which an organization operates, it may need to focus on security for managed devices, or perhaps it might need more of a bring your own device (BYOD) solution. While major SaaS applications improve organizational productivity and flexibility, they can serve as entry points for malicious threats such as malware or be used to share sensitive data with unauthorized parties. In infrastructure-as-a-service platforms, even a simple misconfiguration can cause data leakage and jeopardize an organization’s wellbeing. Without a solution designed to address these modern security concerns, organizations can fall victim to these and other threats.
In recent years, cloud access security brokers have been used to prevent these types of unfortunate scenarios from happening to organizations. Whether it’s securing data on personal devices, limiting external sharing, stopping cloud malware, or other security needs, CASBs have been stepping in and protecting data whether it is in transit or at rest. In our latest white paper, Top CASB Use Cases, we go into detail about how organizations have used cloud access security brokers to embrace both the cloud and BYOD without compromising on security.
For information about how CASBs help secure data, download the Top CASB Use Cases.
By Chris Higgins, Technical Support Engineer, Bitglass
In my last post, I introduced Microsoft Workplace Join. It’s a really convenient feature that can automatically log users in to corporate accounts from any devices of their choosing. However, this approach essentially eliminates all sense of security.
So, if you’re a sane and rational security professional (or even if you’re not), you clearly want to disable this feature immediately. Your options?
Option #1 (Most Secure, Most Convenient): Completely disable InTune Mobile Device Management for O365 and then disable Workplace Join
As Workplace Join can create serious security headaches, one of the most secure and most convenient options is to disable the InTune MDM for Office 365 and then disable Workplace Join completely. Obviously, these should quickly be replaced by other, less invasive security tools. In particular, organizations should consider agentless security for BYOD and mobile in order to protect data and preserve user privacy.
Option #2 (Least Convenient): Use InTune policies to block all personal devices
Microsoft does not provide a method of limiting this feature that does not utilize InTune policies. Effectively, you must either not use InTune at all, or pay to block unwanted access. However, the latter approach means blocking all BYO devices (reducing employee flexibility and efficiency) and introduces the complexity of downloading software to every device, raising additional costs.
Option #3 (Least Convenient and Least Secure): Whack-a-mole manual policing of new device registrations
As an administrator in Azure AD, deleting or disabling an account only prevents automated logins on each of that account’s registered devices—this has to be done manually every time a user links a new endpoint. Unfortunately, deactivation and deletion in Azure do not remove the “Join Workplace or School” link from the control panel of the machine in question. Additionally, deactivation still allows the user to manually log in, as does deletion—neither action prevents the user from re-enrolling the same device. In other words, pursuing this route means playing an endless game of deactivation and deletion whack-a-mole.
By Jacob Serpa, Product Marketing Manager, Bitglass
Here are the top cybersecurity stories of recent weeks:
—LinkedIn security gap exposes users’ data
—Vector app reveals customers’ information
—AWS misconfiguration makes LocalBlox user information public
—New malware steals data via power lines
—Banking apps deemed the most unsecured
LinkedIn security gap exposes users’ data
LinkedIn’s AutoFill functionality was recently discovered to be easily exploitable. The feature allows users to have fields on other websites automatically populated with information from their LinkedIn accounts (for rapid registrations and logins, for example). Researchers quickly realized that this could be exploited by malicious websites that initiate AutoFill, regardless of where visitors click, in order to steal information.
Vector app reveals customers’ information
New Zealand energy company, Vector, developed an application designed to update users on the status of their power; for example, by providing estimates on when power might return during outages. Unfortunately, the app didn’t provide the functionality that the company originally intended. Additionally, it made all of its users’ information (including home address) accessible to anyone who downloaded the app.
AWS misconfiguration makes LocalBlox user information public
Another AWS misconfiguration has exposed the personal information of various individuals – 48 million of them. LocalBlox, which gathers information from public online profiles, was recently found to be leaking Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn information through an unsecured AWS S3 bucket. Leaked information included email addresses, job histories, and even IP addresses in some cases.
New malware steals data via powerlines
PowerHammer, a new type of malware, can steal data in a variety of complex, frightening ways. For example, through computers’ power cables. To learn more about the ins and outs of PowerHammer, click here.
Banking apps deemed the most unsecured
A recent study found that banking applications are typically the most vulnerable type of cloud app. Despite the fact that these services are used by hundreds of millions of people, they consistently hold security flaws that leave them open to the advances of hackers.
Learn more about cloud access security brokers (CASBs) and how they can help you secure data in our cloud-first world with the Definitive Guide to CASBs.
by Kamal Shah, VP, Products and Marketing at Skyhigh Networks
Cloud services are here to stay, and practically everybody is embracing them. In fact, the cloud computing industry is growing at the torrid pace of nearly 30% per year right now, according to Pike Research.
Certainly healthcare service providers are getting on the cloud services bandwagon, either by choice or by decree. As reported in Forbes, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) omnibus and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) requirements stipulate that everyone in the healthcare industry must migrate their patient records and other data to the cloud. This is to facilitate medical professionals’ authorized access to electronic health records (EHRs) to improve patient care and reduce costs.
At the same time, healthcare organizations have an obligation to make sure that their use of cloud services is secure and that personal health information (PHI) is fully protected. The risks are huge if they don’t get this right. Any exposure of PHI is deemed a violation of HIPAA compliance, which can lead to steep fines and other costs for the healthcare service provider, not to mention the loss of trust and confidence of its patients.
Even the best of intentions can backfire on healthcare organizations. PHI doesn’t necessarily have to be lost or stolen in order to violate HIPAA’s letter of the law. The Oregon Health & Science University was recently cited for using an unsecured cloud platform to maintain a spreadsheet containingsensitive patient data. The intent was to make it easier to share accurate information about patients among the healthcare professionals involved in their care.
Unfortunately the university didn’t have a contractual agreement to use the cloud service and the privacy and security of the patient data could not be absolutely assured. Although officials don’t believe the incident will lead to identity theft or financial harm, the university is notifying affected patients as a matter of caution.
So, what’s the prescription for hospitals and other providers to reduce their risk when using cloud services? Security experts recommend a three-step process to facilitate cloud data protection:
- First, get an understanding of all the cloud services already in use by the organization. There’s probably a lot of unofficial “shadow use” of services that company officials aren’t aware of and that may put the organization at risk.
- Next, leverage all the innovation in big data analytics to understand this usage and to ensure that the organization’s policies are consistently enforced.
- And finally, for the recommended cloud services, secure the data in the cloud through contextual access controls based on user, device and location, encryption, and data loss prevention.
Read how one leading hospital put this framework to use and successfully reduced the risk of cloud services.